← Back to Search
David Nucera v. Massachusetts Department of State Police (SPR 20202111)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond · Filed 10-30-2020
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20202111 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by David Nucera concerning records held by Massachusetts Department of State Police, opened 10-30-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20202111
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- David Nucera
- Date Opened
- 10-30-2020
- Date Closed
- 10-30-2020
- Date Request Submitted
- 09-18-2020
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records October 30, 2020 SPR20/2111 Jennifer M. Staples, Esq. Chief Legal Counsel Massachusetts Department of State Police 470 Worcester Road Framingham, MA 01702 Dear Attorney Staples: I have received the petition of David Nucera appealing the nonresponse of the Department of State Police (Department) to his request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Nucera submitted a request for various documents within the possession of the Department. Claiming to not yet have received a response, Mr. Nucera petitioned this office and this appeal was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A (d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4 § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b) (iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b) (viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Jennifer M. Staples, Esq. SPR20/2111 Page 2 October 30, 2020 Conclusion It is my understanding a representative of the Department provided a response to the requestor dated October 1, 2020. Accordingly, I will consider this administrative appeal closed. Mr. Nucera may appeal the substantive nature of the Department’s response within ninety days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: David Nucera