← Back to Search
Corey Farina v. Hingham, Town of - Town Administrator (SPR 20202351)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 11-30-2020
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20202351 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Corey Farina concerning records held by Hingham, Town of - Town Administrator, opened 11-30-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20202351
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Corey Farina
- Date Opened
- 11-30-2020
- Date Closed
- 12-14-2020
- Date Request Submitted
- 10-27-2020
- Response Provided Date
- 04-22-2021
- Processing Fees Charged
- 0.00
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Time to Comply
- 87 Business Days
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records December 14, 2020 SPR20/2351 Mr. Thomas Mayo Town of Hingham Town Administrator 210 Central Street Hingham, MA 02043 Dear Mr. Mayo: I have received the petition of Corey Farina appealing the nonresponse of the Town of Hingham (Town) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Farina requested various documents in the possession of the Town, Police Department, or legal representatives relating to a certain incident. Having received no response, he petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us SPR20/2351 Thomas Mayo Page 2 December 14, 2020 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Town is ordered to provide Mr. Farina with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Corey Farina