MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Ray Lardie v. Lowell, City of - Police Department (SPR 20202425)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Public records appeal decision · Filed 12-08-2020

ClosedAppealDecision

SPR 20202425 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Ray Lardie concerning records held by Lowell, City of - Police Department, opened 12-08-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Public records appeal decision.

Case Details

Case Number
20202425
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Ray Lardie
Custodian
Lowell, City of - Police Department
Date Opened
12-08-2020
Date Closed
12-21-2020
Date Request Submitted
11-13-2020
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records December 21, 2020 SPR20/2425 Gina M. Atwood Lowell Police Department 50 Arcand Drive Lowell, MA 01852 Dear Gina Atwood: I have received the petition of Ray Lardie of PiltserCowan Law LLC appealing the nonresponse of the Lowell Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, on November 13, 2020, Mr. Lardie requested three categories of records concerning an identified individual. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. As of the date of this letter, it is my understanding that the Department has not provided Mr. Lardie a response to their request for records. Order Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Mr. Lardie with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Gina M. Atwood SPR20/2425 Page 2 December 21, 2020 office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Ray Lardie