MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

James M. Merrigan v. Dedham, Town of - Police Department (SPR 20202599)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Public records appeal decision · Filed 12-28-2020

ClosedFee PetitionDecision

SPR 20202599 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by James M. Merrigan concerning records held by Dedham, Town of - Police Department, opened 12-28-2020. Type: Fee Petition. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Public records appeal decision.

Case Details

Case Number
20202599
Case Type
Fee Petition
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
James M. Merrigan
Custodian
Dedham, Town of - Police Department
Date Opened
12-28-2020
Date Closed
01-05-2021

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records January 5, 2021 SPR20/2599 Officer Ronald Pucci Dedham Police Department 600 High Street Dedham, MA 02026 Dear Officer Pucci: I have received your petition on behalf of the Dedham Police Department (Department) seeking to charge $35.56 an hour in responding to a request made by Attorney James M. Merrigan of Rawson Merrigan & Litner, LLP. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). As required by law, a municipality must furnish a copy of their petition to the requestor. Id. In this matter, Attorney Merrigan requested “all motor vehicle accident reports from December 1, 2020 through today, December 10, 2020 that are in your department’s possession, custody, and control.” Petitions to assess fees The Supervisor of Records (Supervisor) may approve a petition from a municipality to charge for time spent segregating or redacting or to charge in excess of $25 per hour, if the Supervisor determines that 1) the request is for a commercial purpose or 2) the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the municipality to comply with the request. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). In rendering such a decision, the Supervisor is required to consider the following: a) the public interest served by limiting the cost of public access to the records; b) the financial ability of the requestor to pay the additional or increased fees; and c) any other relevant extenuating circumstances. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). The statute sets out a two-prong test for determining whether the Supervisor may approve a municipality's petition to allow the municipality to charge for time spent segregating or redacting records or to charge in excess of $25 an hour for the provision of public records. The first prong is whether the request for records was made for a commercial purpose. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). The second prong of the test is whether the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the municipality to comply with the request.The Supervisor must consider 1) if the fee is necessary such that the request could not have been prudently completed without the redaction or segregation or fee in excess of $25 per hour; 2) the amount of the fee is reasonable; One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Officer Ronald Pucci SPR20/2599 Page 2 January 5, 2021 and 3) the fee is not designed to limit, deter or prevent access to requested public records. Id. Current Petition In your December 28, 2020 petition to this office, you state the Department seeks “permission to charge the above requester $35.56 dollars an hour (my hourly rate) for the release of records to be used for commercial use.” In a follow up email dated December 21, 2020, Attorney Merrigan confirms the request is for a commercial purpose. Further, Attorney Merrigan asserted, “[a]s such, I am happy to pay whatever you feel is reasonable beyond the first two hours.” The term “commercial purpose” as used in this section shall mean: the sale or resale of any portion of the public record or the use of information from the public record to advance the requester's strategic business interests in a manner that the requester can reasonably expect to make a profit, and shall not include gathering or reporting news or gathering information to promote citizen oversight or further the understanding of the operation or activities of government or for academic, scientific, journalistic or public research or education. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(ix). Based on the Department’s December 28, 2020 petition and the correspondence provided, it is my understanding that the requests made by Attorney Merrigan meet the statutory definition of a “commercial purpose” within the Public Records Law. See G. L. c. 66, § l0(d)(ix); -se-e- a-ls-o SPR18/1318 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (September 5, 2018). Conclusion Based on the Department’s petition and my finding that the requests are for a commercial purpose, I approve the Department’s petition to charge $35.56 an hour to produce the responsive documents. Please be advised, municipalities may not assess a fee for the first two hours of employee time to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce the record or records requested unless the municipality has 20,000 people or less. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iii). Please note, the requestor has the right to seek judicial review of this decision by commencing a civil action in the appropriate superior court. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A(c).

Officer Ronald Pucci SPR20/2599 Page 3 January 5, 2021 Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: James M. Merrigan, Esq.