MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Susan Petroni v. Framingham, City of (SPR 20210106)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 01-15-2021

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20210106 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Susan Petroni concerning records held by Framingham, City of, opened 01-15-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20210106
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Susan Petroni
Custodian
Framingham, City of
Date Opened
01-15-2021
Date Closed
01-29-2021
Date Request Submitted
01-02-2021
Response Provided Date
01-14-2021
Processing Fees Charged
0.00
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records January 29, 2021 SPR21/0106 Todd C. Palmer City of Framingham 150 Concord Street, Room B-37 Framingham, MA 01702 Dear Todd Palmer: I have received the petition of Susan Petroni appealing the nonresponse of the City of Framingham (City) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On January 4, 2021, Ms. Petroni requested “all emails from all 11 City Councilors on August 26-27, 2020 received or sent to their official city email addresses” and “all emails from all 11 City Councilors on May 20, 2020 received or sent to their official city email addresses.” Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507,511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. As of the date of this letter, it is my understanding that the City has not provided Ms. Petroni a response to her request for records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Todd C. Palmer SPR21/0106 Page 2 January 29, 2021 Conclusion Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide Ms. Petroni with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Susan Petroni