← Back to Search
Paul DeMeo v. Gardner, City of - Community Development & Planning (SPR 20210117)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 01-19-2021
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20210117 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Paul DeMeo concerning records held by Gardner, City of - Community Development & Planning, opened 01-19-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20210117
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Paul DeMeo
- Date Opened
- 01-19-2021
- Date Closed
- 02-02-2021
- Date Request Submitted
- 12-31-2020
- Processing Fees Charged
- 0.00
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records February 2, 2021 SPR21/0117 Mr. Trevor Beauregard Director of Community Development and Planning City of Gardner 115 Pleasant Street Gardner, MA 01440 Dear Mr. Beauregard: I have received the petition of Mr. Paul DeMeo appealing the nonresponse of the City of Gardner (City) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On December 31, 2020, Mr. DeMeo requested certain documents and communications in regards to the “Wilderbrook Development.” Claiming to not yet have received a response, Mr. DeMeo petitioned this office and this appeal was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Mr. Trevor Beauregard SPR21/0117 Page 2 February 2, 2021 In an email dated January 15, 2021, the City asserted it would review and provide the Planning Board files. As of today, it is my understanding that the City has provided no further response. Order Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide Mr. DeMeo with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations within ten business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Mr. DeMeo may appeal the substantive nature of the City’s response within ninety (90) days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Mr. Paul DeMeo