← Back to Search
Mitchell Kosht v. Springfield, City of - Office of the City Clerk (SPR 20210142)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 01-22-2021
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20210142 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Mitchell Kosht concerning records held by Springfield, City of - Office of the City Clerk, opened 01-22-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20210142
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Mitchell Kosht
- Date Opened
- 01-22-2021
- Date Closed
- 02-04-2021
- Date Request Submitted
- 11-04-2020
- Time to Comply
- Ten (10) Business Days
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records February 4, 2021 SPR20/0142 Ms. Andrea Stone City of Springfield Office of the City Clerk 36 Court Street Springfield, MA 01103 Dear Ms. Andrea Stone: I have received the petition of Mr. Mitchell Kosht appealing the nonresponse of the City of Springfield Office of the City Clerk (Office) to his request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Mr. Kosht requested records related to a list of arrests. Claiming to not yet have received a response, Mr. Kosht petitioned this office and this appeal was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Ms. Andrea Stone SPR21/0142 Page 2 February 4, 2021 Conclusion Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal from a member of the Public Records Division staff, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Office is ordered to provide Mr. Kosht with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Mr. Mitchell Kosht