MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Maureen Ronayne v. Winchester, Town of - Public Schools (SPR 20210316)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 02-08-2021

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20210316 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Maureen Ronayne concerning records held by Winchester, Town of - Public Schools, opened 02-08-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20210316
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Maureen Ronayne
Custodian
Winchester, Town of - Public Schools
Date Opened
02-08-2021
Date Closed
02-17-2021
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Time to Comply
3 Business days
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records February 17, 2021 SPR21/0316 Judith A. Evans, Ed.D. Records Access Officer Winchester Public Schools 40 Samoset Road Winchester, MA 01890 Dear Dr. Evans: I have received the petition of Maureen Ronayne appealing the response of the Winchester Public Schools (School) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On January 30, 2021, Ms. Ronayne requested: “[A]ll emails and text messages for the period from August 1, 2020 through January 30, 2021 that reference any of these terms: ‘Dyslexia’ or ‘literacy’ or ‘evidenced based’ or ‘science of reading’ or ‘reading’ of the following people: [a]ll of Members of the School Committee[.]” The School provided a response on February 3, 2021, which included a fee estimate. Unsatisfied with the School’s response, Ms. Ronayne petitioned this office and SPR21/0316 was opened as a result. Fee Estimates If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. A municipality may assess a reasonable fee for the production of a public record except those records that are freely available for public inspection. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d). The fees must reflect the actual cost of complying with a particular request. Id. A maximum fee of five cents ($.05) per page may be assessed for a black and white single or double-sided photocopy of a public record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(i). One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Judith A. Evans, Ed.D. SPR21/0316 Page 2 February 17, 2021 Municipalities may not assess a fee for the first two (2) hours of employee time to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce the record or records requested unless the municipality has 20,000 people or less. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iii). Where appropriate, municipalities may include as part of the fee an hourly rate equal to or less than the hourly rate attributed to the lowest paid employee who has the necessary skill required to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce a record requested, but the fee shall not be more than $25 per hour. Id. However, municipalities may charge more than $25 per hour if such rate is - approved by the Supervisor under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). A fee shall not be assessed for time spent segregating or redacting records unless such segregation or redaction is required by law or approved by the Supervisor under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iii); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). The School’s February 3rd response In its February 3, 2021 response, the School indicates, “[t]here were approximately 1,622 documents that fall within your search parameters.” The School further indicates the estimated time to review and redact the records is 27 hours, with the first two hours subtracted, for a total estimated cost of $625.00. The School states, “[a]lthough the public records law limits the District to assessing a maximum rate of $25.00 per hour, please note that the hourly rate of the lowest-paid employee qualified to complete your request exceeds that rate.” The School indicates “[e]ach document must be reviewed before it may be provided to you due to the strong likelihood that they contain information [which] is exempt …” citing Exemptions (a) and (c). With respect to its Exemption (a) claim, the School explains the request “… implicates student record/education record information under 603 CMR 23.00 and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (‘FERPA’) …” For its Exemption (c) claim, the School explains the records may contain “. . . medical files or information relevant to a student’s disability, or materials/data related to a student, the disclosure of which may constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” The School further explains, “[t]his estimate is based on twenty-seven (27) hours spent reviewing and redacting the responsive documents. The District estimates that because of the confidential student record and medical information contained in these records, it will take an average of 1 – 1.5 minutes to review and redact each page. This number is based on the need to carefully read each page, make the necessary determinations regarding whether the record contains exempt information, redact any confidential information contained in the records if found, and the possibility that other individuals may need to be consulted throughout this process.” Based on the School’s response, it is unclear if the School is assessing a fee for segregating and redacting records under Exemption (c). The School is reminded that under the Public Records Law, a fee may not be assessed for time spent segregating or redacting records unless such segregation or redaction is required by law under Exemption (a) or approved by the

Judith A. Evans, Ed.D. SPR21/0316 Page 3 February 17, 2021 Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). See G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(ii); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). The School must clarify this matter. Further, this office encourages Ms. Ronayne and the School to continue to communicate to facilitate providing records more efficiently and affordably. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vii) (a municipality shall suggest a reasonable modification of the scope of the request or offer to assist the requestor to modify the scope of the request if doing so would enable the municipality to produce records sought more efficiently and affordably). Conclusion Accordingly, the School is ordered to provide a response to Ms. Ronayne, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Maureen Ronayne