← Back to Search
John Saia v. Malden, City of (SPR 20211266)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond · Filed 05-20-2021
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20211266 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by John Saia concerning records held by Malden, City of, opened 05-20-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20211266
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- John Saia
- Custodian
- Malden, City of
- Date Opened
- 05-20-2021
- Date Closed
- 06-02-2021
- Date Request Submitted
- 04-29-2021
- Time to Comply
- 9 Business Days
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records June 2, 2021 SPR21/1266 Greg Lucey City Clerk City of Malden 110 Pleasant Street, First Floor Malden, MA 02148 Dear Mr. Lucey: I have received the petition of John Saia appealing the nonresponse of the City of Malden (City) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On April 29, 2021, Mr. Saia requested records related to the City’s “small cell ordinance.” Claiming to not yet have received a response, Mr. Saia petitioned this office and this appeal was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Greg Lucey Page 2 SPR21/1266 June 2, 2021 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, the City has yet to provide a response with respect to Mr. Saia’s request. Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide Mr. Saia with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Mr. Saia may appeal the substantive nature of the City’s response within ninety (90) days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, ' I . I ' - - - . ~ - -.- Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: John Saia