MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Susan Petroni v. Framingham, City of (SPR 20211356)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 05-28-2021

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20211356 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Susan Petroni concerning records held by Framingham, City of, opened 05-28-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20211356
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Susan Petroni
Custodian
Framingham, City of
Date Opened
05-28-2021
Date Closed
06-14-2021
Time to Comply
Ten (10) business days

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records June 14, 2021 SPR21/1355 & SPR21/1356 Mr. Todd C. Palmer City of Framingham 150 Concord Street, Room B-37 Framingham, MA 01702 Dear Mr. Palmer: I have received the petitions of Susan Petroni appealing the nonresponse of the City of Framingham (City) to two requests for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Ms. Petroni requested all emails sent to and from two City email addresses on identified dates. Having received no response, she petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

SPR21/1355 & SPR21/1356 Todd C. Palmer Page 2 June 14, 2021 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide Ms. Petroni with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. If Ms. Petroni is unsatisfied, she may appeal the substantive nature of the City’s response within 90 days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Susan Petroni