MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

California PRA v. Boston, City of - Public Records (SPR 20211420)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 06-04-2021

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20211420 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by California PRA concerning records held by Boston, City of - Public Records, opened 06-04-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20211420
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
California PRA
Custodian
Boston, City of - Public Records
Date Opened
06-04-2021
Date Closed
06-15-2021
Date Request Submitted
04-05-2021
Time to Comply
Ten (10) Business Days

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records June 15, 2021 SPR21/1420 Shawn A. Williams, Esq. City of Boston 1 City Hall Plaza, Room 615 Boston, MA 02201 Dear Attorney Williams: I have received the petition of California PRA appealing the nonresponse of the City of Boston (City) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, California PRA requested various categories of records relating to Mayor Kim Janey in her capacity as a Mayor and City Council President. Having received no response, they petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

SPR21/1420 Shawn A. Williams, Esq. Page 2 June 15, 2021 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide California PRA with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. If the requestor is unsatisfied, they may appeal the substantive nature of the City’s response within 90 days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: California PRA