← Back to Search
Olufunmilola Shelly v. Framingham, City of - Accounting Department (SPR 20211746)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 07-15-2021
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20211746 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Olufunmilola Shelly concerning records held by Framingham, City of - Accounting Department, opened 07-15-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20211746
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Olufunmilola Shelly
- Date Opened
- 07-15-2021
- Date Closed
- 07-29-2021
- Date Request Submitted
- 06-14-2021
- Processing Fees Charged
- 0.00
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Time to Comply
- Ten (10) Business Days
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records July 29, 2021 SPR21/1746 Richard Howarth City Accountant City of Framingham 150 Concord Street Framingham, MA 01702 Dear Mr. Howarth: I have received the petition of Olufunmilola Shelly appealing the nonresponse of the City of Framingham (City) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On June 14, 2021, Ms. Shelly requested in pertinent part numerous emails between named individuals from 1/1/2021 to 6/13/2021 including all attachments. Claiming to not yet have received responsive records, Ms. Shelly petitioned this office and SPR21/1746, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us SPR21/1746 Richard Howarth Page 2 July 29, 2021 Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, it remains unclear whether the City has provided a response. Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide Ms. Shelly with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Ms. Shelly may appeal the substantive nature of the City’s response within 90 days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Olufunmilola Shelly