MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Joseph A. Padolsky v. Middlesex County District Attorney's Office (SPR 20211860)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 07-27-2021

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20211860 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Joseph A. Padolsky concerning records held by Middlesex County District Attorney's Office, opened 07-27-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20211860
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Joseph A. Padolsky
Custodian
Middlesex County District Attorney's Office
Date Opened
07-27-2021
Date Closed
08-06-2021
Date Request Submitted
07-02-2021
Processing Fees Charged
0.00
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Time to Comply
9 Business Days
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records August 6, 2021 SPR21/1860 Ms. Kim Gouveia Middlesex County District Attorney’s Office 15 Commonwealth Avenue Woburn, MA 01801 Dear Ms. Gouveia: I have received the petition of Joseph Padolsky appealing the nonresponse of the Middlesex County District Attorney’s Office (Office) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Padolsky requested copies of certain Office policies and communications with the City of Somerville related to an idenfitied detective. Having received no response, he petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

SPR21/1860 Kim Gouveia Page 2 August 6, 2021 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Office is ordered to provide Mr. Padolsky with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. If Mr. Padolsky is unsatisfied, he may appeal the substantive nature of the Office’s response within 90 days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Joseph Padolsky