MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

James D. Smith v. Hampden-Wilbraham Regional School District (SPR 20211881)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 07-29-2021

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20211881 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by James D. Smith concerning records held by Hampden-Wilbraham Regional School District, opened 07-29-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20211881
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
James D. Smith
Custodian
Hampden-Wilbraham Regional School District
Date Opened
07-29-2021
Date Closed
08-09-2021
Time to Comply
1 Business Day

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records August 9, 2021 SPR21/1881 Karen Belsky Hampden-Wilbraham Regional School District 621 Main Street Wilbraham, MA 01095 Dear Ms. Belsky: I have received the petition of James D. Smith appealing the nonresponse of the Hampden-Wilbraham Regional School District (District) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Smith requested “copies of any and all communications from 7/1/2020 to present, to/from the School Committee, Superintendent or other HWRSD Administrative staff regarding Equity Audits.” Having received no response, he petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Karen Belsky SPR21/1881 Page 2 August 9, 2021 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the District is ordered to provide Mr. Smith with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. If Mr. Smith is unsatisfied, he may appeal the substantive nature of the District’s response within 90 days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: James D. Smith