← Back to Search
Todd Wallack v. Worcester, City of - Police Department (SPR 20211919)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency must provide records · Filed 08-02-2021
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20211919 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Todd Wallack concerning records held by Worcester, City of - Police Department, opened 08-02-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency must provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20211919
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Todd Wallack
- Date Opened
- 08-02-2021
- Date Closed
- 08-06-2021
- Date Request Submitted
- 07-06-2021
- Processing Fees Charged
- 0.00
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Time to Comply
- Ten (10) Business Days
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records August 6, 2021 SPR21/1919 Mr. Michael Vigneux City of Worcester Police Department 911 Lincoln Square Worcester, MA 01608 Dear Mr. Vigneux: I have received the petition of Todd Wallack appealing the nonresponse of the Worcester Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Wallack requested an “electronic log of internal affairs complaints/investigations against sworn officers of the Worcester Police Department as far back as you maintain the log in your current computer system.” Having received no response, he petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us SPR21/1919 Michael Vigneux Page 2 August 6, 2021 Order Subsequent to the opening of this appeal, the Department indicated that it is working to compile the records responsive to Mr. Wallack’s request and intends to provide a response. Accordingly, the Department must provide said response to Mr. Wallack in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. If Mr. Wallack is unsatisfied, he may appeal the substantive nature of the Department’s response within 90 days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Todd Wallack