← Back to Search
Karina Wilkinson v. Dukes County Sheriff's Office (SPR 20212099)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 08-18-2021
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20212099 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Karina Wilkinson concerning records held by Dukes County Sheriff's Office, opened 08-18-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20212099
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Karina Wilkinson
- Custodian
- Dukes County Sheriff's Office
- Date Opened
- 08-18-2021
- Date Closed
- 08-31-2021
- Date Request Submitted
- 07-29-2021
- Processing Fees Charged
- 0.00
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Time to Comply
- Ten (10) Business Days
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records August 31, 2021 SPR21/2099 Sheriff James D. Neville Dukes County Sheriff’s Department 149 Main Street, P.O. Box 252 Edgartown, MA 02539 Dear Sheriff Neville: I have received the petition of Karina Wilkinson appealing the nonresponse of the Dukes County Sheriff’s Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Ms. Wilkinson requested various categories of records, including records related to inmate calling services, visitation, and inmate tablet usage. Having received no response, she petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us SPR21/2099 Sheriff James D. Neville Page 2 August 31, 2021 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Ms. Wilkinson with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. If Ms. Wilkinson is unsatisfied, she may appeal the substantive nature of the Department’s response within 90 days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Karina Wilkinson