← Back to Search
Todd Wallack v. Natick, Town of (SPR 20212248)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 09-02-2021
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20212248 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Todd Wallack concerning records held by Natick, Town of, opened 09-02-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20212248
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Todd Wallack
- Custodian
- Natick, Town of
- Date Opened
- 09-02-2021
- Date Closed
- 09-15-2021
- Date Request Submitted
- 08-10-2021
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Time to Comply
- 39 Business Days
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records September 15, 2021 SPR21/2248 Kathleen Lentini Communication/Information Officer Town of Natick Natick Town Hall 13 East Central Street Natick, MA 01760 Dear Ms. Lentini: I have received the petition of Todd Wallack appealing the nonresponse of the Town of Natick (Town) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On August 10, 2021, Mr. Wallack requested, “… a copy of any agreements between New England Police Benevolent Association Local #2 and the Natick Patrol Officers’ Association and the Town signed since 2018” referencing specific officers. Claiming to not yet have received a response, Mr. Wallack petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR21/2248, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Kathleen Lentini SPR21/2248 Page 2 September 15, 2021 If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, it remains unclear whether a response has been provided. Accordingly, the Town is ordered to provide Mr. Wallack with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Mr. Wallack may appeal the substantive nature of the Town’s response within ninety days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Todd Wallack