MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Todd Wallack v. Natick, Town of (SPR 20212249)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 09-02-2021

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20212249 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Todd Wallack concerning records held by Natick, Town of, opened 09-02-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20212249
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Todd Wallack
Custodian
Natick, Town of
Date Opened
09-02-2021
Date Closed
09-15-2021
Date Request Submitted
08-10-2021
Time to Comply
39 Business Days

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records September 15, 2021 SPR21/2249 Kathleen Lentini Communication/Information Officer Town of Natick Natick Town Hall 13 East Central Street Natick, MA 01760 Dear Ms. Lentini: I have received the petition of Todd Wallack appealing the nonresponse of the Town of Natick (Town) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On August 10, 2021, Mr. Wallack requested a copy of an identified agreement. Claiming to not yet have received a response, Mr. Wallack petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR21/2249, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Kathleen Lentini SPR21/2249 Page 2 September 15, 2021 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, it remains unclear whether a response has been provided. Accordingly, the Town is ordered to provide Mr. Wallack with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Mr. Wallack may appeal the substantive nature of the Town’s response within ninety days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Todd Wallack