← Back to Search
Olufunmilola Shelly v. Natick, Town of - Police Department (SPR 20212306)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 09-09-2021
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20212306 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Olufunmilola Shelly concerning records held by Natick, Town of - Police Department, opened 09-09-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20212306
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Olufunmilola Shelly
- Custodian
- Natick, Town of - Police Department
- Date Opened
- 09-09-2021
- Date Closed
- 09-22-2021
- Date Request Submitted
- 08-13-2021
- Processing Fees Charged
- 0.00
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Time to Comply
- Ten (10) Business Days
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records September 22, 2021 SPR21/2306 Lieutenant Leo Fitzpatrick Natick Police Department 20 East Central Street Natick, MA 01760 Dear Lt. Fitzpatrick: I have received the petition of Olufunmilola Shelly appealing the nonresponse of the Natick Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Ms. Shelly requested all emails containing or related to identified words and phrases. Having received no response, she petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us SPR21/2306 Lt. Leo Fitzpatrick Page 2 September 23, 2021 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Ms. Shelly with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. If Ms. Shelly is unsatisfied, she may appeal the substantive nature of the Department’s response within 90 days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Olufunmilola Shelly