MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Brian Petrini-Smith v. Natick, Town of (SPR 20212309)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 09-09-2021

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20212309 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Brian Petrini-Smith concerning records held by Natick, Town of, opened 09-09-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20212309
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Brian Petrini-Smith
Custodian
Natick, Town of
Date Opened
09-09-2021
Date Closed
09-23-2021
Processing Fees Charged
0.00
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Time to Comply
Ten (10) Business Days
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records September 23, 2021 SPR21/2309 Kathleen Lentini Town of Natick Natick Town Hall, 1st Floor Natick, MA 01760 Dear Ms. Lentini: I have received the petition of Brian Petrini-Smith appealing the nonresponse of the Town of Natick (Town) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Petrini-Smith requested the Town Administrator and/or Select Board’s written review of a Town employee. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Kathleen Lentini SPR21/2309 Page 2 September 23, 2021 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Town is ordered to provide Mr. Petrini-Smith with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Brian Petrini-Smith