MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Frank Visco v. Athol-Royalston Regional School District (SPR 20212420)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 09-21-2021

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20212420 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Frank Visco concerning records held by Athol-Royalston Regional School District, opened 09-21-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20212420
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Frank Visco
Custodian
Athol-Royalston Regional School District
Date Opened
09-21-2021
Date Closed
09-28-2021
Date Request Submitted
08-31-2021
Processing Fees Charged
0.00
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Time to Comply
Ten (10) Business Days
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records September 28, 2021 SPR21/2420 Ms. Jody Leazott Athol-Royalston Regional School District 1062 Pleasant Street Athol, MA 01331 Dear Ms. Leazott: I have received the petition of Frank Visco appealing the nonresponse of the Athol- Royalston Regional School District (District) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Visco requested records related to resignation requests of school committee members. Having received no response, he petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

SPR21/2420 Jody Leazott Page 2 October 12, 2021 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the District is ordered to provide Mr. Visco with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. If Mr. Visco is unsatisfied, he may appeal the substantive nature of the District’s response within 90 days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Frank Visco