MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

David M. Hass v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (SPR 20212579)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Public records appeal decision · Filed 10-05-2021

ClosedAppealDecision

SPR 20212579 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by David M. Hass concerning records held by Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, opened 10-05-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Public records appeal decision.

Case Details

Case Number
20212579
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
David M. Hass
Custodian
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Date Opened
10-05-2021
Date Closed
10-18-2021
Date Request Submitted
09-01-2021
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Time to Comply
3 Business Days
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records October 18, 2021 SPR21/2579 Attorney Julie A. Ciollo Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority 10 Park Plaza, Suite #7760 Boston, MA 02116 Dear Attorney Ciollo: I have received the petition of Attorney David M. Hass appealing the nonresponse of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Attorney Hass requested various documents. Having received no response, he petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Attorney Julie A. Ciollo SPR21/2579 Page 2 October 18, 2021 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the MBTA is ordered to provide Attorney Hass with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. If Attorney Hass is unsatisfied, he may appeal the substantive nature of the MBTA’s response within 90 days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Attorney David M. Hass