← Back to Search
Frank Wood v. Framingham, City of - City Council Department (SPR 20212681)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 10-13-2021
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20212681 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Frank Wood concerning records held by Framingham, City of - City Council Department, opened 10-13-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20212681
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Frank Wood
- Date Opened
- 10-13-2021
- Date Closed
- 10-27-2021
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records October 27, 2021 SPR21/2681 Maureen McKeon Department RAO City of Framingham 150 Concord St. Framingham, MA 01702 Dear Ms. McKeon: I have received the petition of Frank Wood appealing the response of the City of Framingham (City) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On October 6, 2021, Mr. Wood requested, “…all emails sent to [named person] or [named person] between 10/04/2021 and present…all emails sent to the full council between 10/04/21 and present…” On October 12, 2021, the City responded. Unsatisfied with the City’s response, Mr. Wood petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR21/2681, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Maureen McKeon SPR21/2681 Page 2 October 27, 2021 The City’s October 12th response In its October 12th response, the City provided numerous records to Mr. Wood. Current Appeal In his current appeal petition, Mr. Wood contends that there are additional records responsive to his request. Based on the City’s response, it is unclear if it possesses additional records responsive to the above request. The duty to comply with requests for records extends to those records that exist and are in the possession, custody, or control of the custodian of records at the time of the request. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a)(ii). Conclusion Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide Mr. Wood with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Frank Wood