MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Fengshu Yang v. Executive Office of Public Safety and Security (SPR 20212970)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 11-08-2021

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20212970 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Fengshu Yang concerning records held by Executive Office of Public Safety and Security, opened 11-08-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20212970
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Fengshu Yang
Custodian
Executive Office of Public Safety and Security
Date Opened
11-08-2021
Date Closed
11-17-2021
Date Request Submitted
10-19-2021
Processing Fees Charged
0.00
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Time to Comply
Ten (10) Business Days
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records November 17, 2021 SPR21/2970 Arielle Mullaney, Esq. Executive Office of Public Safety and Security 1 Ashburton Place, Room 2133 Boston, MA 02108 Dear Attorney Mullaney: I have received the petition of Fengshu Yang appealing the nonresponse of the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security (Office) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Fengshu Yang requested “files containing officers [sic] and prison guards’ PREA training information.” Having received no response, the requestor petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

SPR21/2970 Arielle Mullaney, Esq. Page 2 November 17, 2021 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Office is ordered to provide Fengshu Yang with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. If Fengshu Yang is unsatisfied, they may appeal the substantive nature of the Office’s response within 90 days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Fengshu Yang