← Back to Search
Frank Wood v. Framingham, City of (SPR 20213117)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 11-29-2021
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20213117 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Frank Wood concerning records held by Framingham, City of, opened 11-29-2021. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20213117
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Frank Wood
- Custodian
- Framingham, City of
- Date Opened
- 11-29-2021
- Date Closed
- 12-13-2021
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records December 13, 2021 SPR21/3117 Mr. Todd C. Palmer City of Framingham 150 Concord Street Room B-37 Framingham, MA 01702 Dear Mr. Palmer: I have received the petition of Mr. Frank Wood appealing the nonresponse of the City of Framingham (City) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Horowitz requested emails sent or received by City employees regarding a public records request. Having received no response, he petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Mr. Todd C. Palmer SPR21/3117 Page 2 December 13, 2021 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide Mr. Wood with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. If Mr. Wood is unsatisfied, he may appeal the substantive nature of the City’s response within 90 days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Mr. Frank Wood