MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Colman Herman v. Department of Occupational Licensure (SPR 20213372)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency must provide records · Filed 12-29-2021

ClosedTime PetitionPetitioner Won

SPR 20213372 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Colman Herman concerning records held by Department of Occupational Licensure, opened 12-29-2021. Type: Time Petition. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency must provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20213372
Case Type
Time Petition
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Colman Herman
Custodian
Department of Occupational Licensure
Date Opened
12-29-2021
Date Closed
01-04-2022

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records January 4, 2022 SPR21/3372 Attorney Clinton Dick Department of Occupational Licensure 1000 Washington Street, Suite 710 Boston, MA 02118-6100 Dear Attorney Dick: I have received your petition on behalf of the Department of Occupational Licensure (Department) seeking an extension of time to produce records. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c). As required by law, it is my understanding that the Department furnished a copy of this petition to the requestor. Id. On December 15, 2021, Mr. Herman requested “…any and all communications related to [a 22-page audit report].” Petition for an Extension of Time Under the Public Records Law, upon a showing of good cause, the Supervisor of Records (Supervisor) may grant a single extension to an agency not to exceed 20 business days and a single extension to a municipality not to exceed 30 business days. In determining whether there has been a showing of good cause, the Supervisor shall consider, but shall not be limited to considering: (i) the need to search for, collect, segregate or examine records; (ii) the scope of redaction required to prevent unlawful disclosure; (iii) the capacity or the normal business hours of operation of the agency or municipality to produce the request without the extension; (iv) efforts undertaken by the agency or municipality in fulfilling the current request and previous requests; (v) whether the request, either individually or as part of a series of requests from the same requestor, is frivolous or intended to harass or intimidate the agency or municipality; and (vi) the public interest served by expeditious disclosure. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c). If the Supervisor determines that the request is part of a series of contemporaneous requests that are frivolous or designed to intimidate or harass, and the requests are not intended One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Clinton Dick, Esq. SPR21/3372 Page 2 January 4, 2022 for the broad dissemination of information to the public about actual or alleged government activity, the Supervisor may grant a longer extension or relieve the agency or municipality of its obligation to provide copies of the records sought. Id. The filing of a petition does not affect the requirement that a Records Access Officer (RAO) shall provide an initial response to a requestor within ten business days after receipt of a request for public records. 950 C.M.R. 36.06(4)(b). Current Petition In its petition dated December 29, 2021, the Department “…is seeking an extension of fifteen (15) business days.” The Department explains “[t]he request in question involves a search of emails from several individuals at the [Department]. Any identified responsive records will require a review and possible redaction of attorney-client communications, among other possible exemptions.” The Department further notes that “[t]he nature of this search and review means that the [Department] requires additional time to gather, review, segregate, and prepare potentially responsive records for production.” In light of the above, I find the Department has established good cause to permit an extension of time. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(c)(i)-(iv). I hereby grant the Department an extension of 15 business days to furnish copies of records responsive to Mr. Herman’s request. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(c). To the extent possible, the Department must provide responsive records on a rolling basis. Conclusion Accordingly, I find the Department has established good cause for a time extension of 15 business days as described above. Please note, Mr. Herman has the right to seek judicial review of this decision by commencing a civil action in the appropriate superior court. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv)(4), 10A(c). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Colman Herman