MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Christopher Kennedy v. Boston, City of - Public Schools (SPR 20220084)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 01-13-2022

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20220084 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Christopher Kennedy concerning records held by Boston, City of - Public Schools, opened 01-13-2022. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20220084
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Christopher Kennedy
Custodian
Boston, City of - Public Schools
Date Opened
01-13-2022
Date Closed
01-28-2022
Date Request Submitted
11-04-2021

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records January 28, 2022 SPR21/0084 Shawn A. Williams, Esq. Director of Public Records Records Access Officer City of Boston Public Schools 2300 Washington Street Boston, MA 02119 Dear Attorney Williams: I have received the petition of Justin Kennedy, Esq. of the Kennedy Law Office appealing the response of the Boston Public Schools (School) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On November 4, 2021, Attorney Kennedy requested an incident report from a named school. On January 13, 2022, the School responded providing the requested record with redactions. Unsatisfied with the School’s response, Attorney Kennedy petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR22/0084, was opened as a result The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Shawn A. Williams, Esq. SPR22/0084 Page 2 January 28, 2022 The School’s January 13th response In its January 13th response, the School enclosed responsive records in redacted form. The School cited no exemption to justify the redactions. The School’s response did not contain the specificity required in a denial of access to public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv) (“the burden shall be upon the custodian to prove with specificity the exemption which applies”); see also Globe Newspaper Co. v. Police - - - - Comm’r, 419 Mass. 852, 857 (1995); Flatley, 419 Mass. at 511. Specifically, the School has not met its burden to show how the redacted portions fall within an exemption. It is also not clear from the School’s response, what information relating to an individual was redacted from the responsive records. As a result, I find the School did not satisfy its burden in responding to this records request. The School is advised that a records custodian is required to not only cite an exemption, but to specifically explain the applicability of the exemption to the requested records in order to comply with the Public Records Law and its Regulations. Further, to deny access to a record under the Public Records Law, a records access officer must identify the record, categories of records, or portions of the record it intends to withhold. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3)(c)(4). Conclusion Accordingly, the School is ordered to provide Attorney Kennedy with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Justin Kennedy, Esq.