MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Benjamin Maddison v. Springfield, City of - Police Department (SPR 20220141)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 01-21-2022

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20220141 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Benjamin Maddison concerning records held by Springfield, City of - Police Department, opened 01-21-2022. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20220141
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Benjamin Maddison
Custodian
Springfield, City of - Police Department
Date Opened
01-21-2022
Date Closed
02-02-2022

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records February 2, 2022 SPR22/0141 Stephen Roche, Esq. Springfield Police Department 130 Pearl Street Springfield, MA 01105 Dear Attorney Roche: I have received the petition of Benjamin Maddison appealing the nonresponse of the Springfield Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On November 3, 2021, Mr. Maddison requested a copy of the Springfield Police Use of Force Policy. Claiming to not yet have received responsive records, Mr. Maddison petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR22/0141, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Stephen Roche, Esq. SPR22/0141 Page 2 February 2, 2022 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Mr. Maddison with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Benjamin Maddison