MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

David Weimer v. Executive Office of Public Safety and Security (SPR 20220473)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 02-28-2022

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20220473 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by David Weimer concerning records held by Executive Office of Public Safety and Security, opened 02-28-2022. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20220473
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
David Weimer
Custodian
Executive Office of Public Safety and Security
Date Opened
02-28-2022
Date Closed
03-14-2022

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records March 14, 2022 SPR22/0473 Arielle Mullaney, Esq. Executive Office of Public Safety & Security One Ashburton Place, Room 2133 Boston, MA 02108 Dear Attorney Mullaney: I have received the petition of David Weimer appealing the nonresponse of the Executive Office of Public Safety & Security (Office) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On January 23, 2022, Mr. Weimer requested any report or findings filed by the “Special Commission to identify and evaluate potential sites suitable for the location of a replacement justice complex that includes a jail facility in the southern portion of Middlesex County” as created by Chapter 113, Acts of 2018. Claiming to not yet have received responsive records, Mr. Weimer petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR22/0473, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Arielle Mullaney, Esq. SPR22/0473 Page 2 March 14, 2022 If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Office is ordered to provide Mr. Weimer with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: David Weimer