← Back to Search
Marion J. King v. Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (SPR 20220621)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Administratively closed · Filed 03-16-2022
ClosedAppealResolved
SPR 20220621 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Marion J. King concerning records held by Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, opened 03-16-2022. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Administratively closed.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20220621
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Marion J. King
- Date Opened
- 03-16-2022
- Date Closed
- 03-30-2022
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records March 30, 2022 SPR22/0621 Helene Bettencourt Records Access Officer Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 75 Pleasant Street Malden, MA 02148-4906 Dear Ms. Bettencourt: I have received the petition of Marion King appealing the response of the Department Elementary and Secondary Education (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On February 25, 2022, Ms. King requested, “…all records created by the [named] office related to the [named] process for [named school]. Please also provide all records received by [named] from the school district in relation to the monitoring report…” On March 14, 2022, the Department responded. Unsatisfied with the Department’s response, Ms. King petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR22/0621, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv) (written response must “identify any records, categories of records or portions of records that the agency or municipality intends to withhold, and provide the specific reasons for such withholding, including the specific exemption or exemptions upon which the withholding is based…”); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Helene Bettencourt SPR22/0621 Page 2 March 30, 2022 The Department’s March 14th response On March 14, 2022, the Department provided responsive records to the request. Current Appeal In her current appeal Ms. King indicated that the Department had additional records responsive to her request. In a phone call with a Department representative and a Staff Attorney, the Department confirmed that they had no additional records responsive to the request. No Duty to Create Records Please be advised, under the Public Records Law a custodian is not required to create a record in response to a public records request. See G. L. c. 66, § 6A(d). In addition, a public employee is not required to answer questions, or do research, or create documents in response to questions. See 32 Op. Att’y Gen. 157, 165 (May 18, 1977). The duty to comply with requests for records extends to those records that exist and are in the possession, custody, or control of the custodian of records at the time of the request. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a)(ii). Conclusion Where the Department confirmed it does not possess any additional records responsive to Ms. King’s request, and has no duty to create records responsive to the requests, I will now consider this administrative appeal closed. If Ms. King is not satisfied with the resolution of this administrative appeal, please be advised that this office shares jurisdiction with the Superior Court of the Commonwealth. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(b). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Helene Bettencourt