MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Grace Ferguson v. Marblehead, Town of - Police Department (SPR 20220763)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 04-01-2022

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20220763 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Grace Ferguson concerning records held by Marblehead, Town of - Police Department, opened 04-01-2022. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20220763
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Grace Ferguson
Custodian
Marblehead, Town of - Police Department
Date Opened
04-01-2022
Date Closed
04-11-2022
Time to Comply
Four (4) Business Days

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records April 11, 2022 SPR22/0763 Dennis King Chief of Police Marblehead Police Department 11 Gerry Street Marblehead, MA 01945 Dear Chief King: I have received the petition of Grace Ferguson appealing the response of the Marblehead Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On February 17, 2022, Ms. Ferguson requested the following, “dating back to January 1, 2010:” - All internal affairs cases of domestic violence, and - All internal affairs cases of sexual violence, including but not limited to rape and sexual assault. The Department responded on March 4, 2022, providing a fee estimate. Objecting to the fees, Ms. Ferguson appealed, and this case was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Att’y for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832 • Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Dennis King SPR22/0763 Page 2 April 11, 2022 must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response, a written good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records ----- custodian must provide the responsive records. Fee Estimates - Municipalities A municipality may assess a reasonable fee for the production of a public record except those records that are freely available for public inspection. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d). The fees must reflect the actual cost of complying with a particular request. Id. A maximum fee of five cents ($.05) per page may be assessed for a black and white single or double-sided photocopy of a public record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(i). Municipalities may not assess a fee for the first 2 (two) hours of employee time to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce the record or records requested unless the municipality has 20,000 people or less. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iii). Where appropriate, municipalities may include as part of the fee an hourly rate equal to or less than the hourly rate attributed to the lowest paid employee who has the necessary skill required to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce a record requested, but the fee shall not be more than $25 per hour. Id. However, municipalities may charge more than $25 per hour if such rate is approved by the Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). A fee shall not be assessed for time spent segregating or redacting records unless such segregation or redaction is required by law or approved by the Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). See G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iii); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). The Department’s March 4th Fee Estimate In its March 4, 2022 fee estimate, the Department provides the following information: The lowest paid Town employee capable of reviewing, segregating, and redacting the responsive documents is paid at a rate of $25.00 per hour. The Town’s good faith estimate of the time required to comply with [the] request is eight hours. At the cost of $25.00 per hour, less two hours, this amounts to $200.00. Based on the Department’s response, it is unclear why the Department requires eight hours to respond to the request. The Department must provide further details regarding the tasks involved and what each task entails, including the time it is allocating to compiling, segregating, redacting and reproducing the requested records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv) (requiring the amount of the fee be reasonable).

Dennis King SPR22/0763 Page 3 April 11, 2022 For the reasons discussed above, I find the Department must revise its fee estimate or provide further explanation of how the fees assessed are consistent with G. L. c. 66, § 10(d). Conclusion Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Ms. Ferguson with a response to her request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Grace Ferguson Alex M. Castro, Esq.