MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Robert Bland v. Rockport, Town of (SPR 20220963)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 04-25-2022

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20220963 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Robert Bland concerning records held by Rockport, Town of, opened 04-25-2022. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20220963
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Robert Bland
Custodian
Rockport, Town of
Date Opened
04-25-2022
Date Closed
05-09-2022
Time to Comply
13 Business Days

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records May 9, 2022 SPR22/0963 Patricia Brown Town of Rockport Rockport Town Hall 34 Broadway Rockport, MA 01966 Dear Ms. Brown: I have received the petition of Robert Bland appealing the nonresponse of the Town of Rockport (Town) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On March 28, 2022, Mr. Bland requested records showing the date of, and the method used, to establish each of four (4) private ways as public. Claiming to not yet have received responsive records, Mr. Bland petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR22/0963, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Patricia Brown SPR22/0963 Page 2 May 9, 2022 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Town is ordered to provide Mr. Bland with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Robert Bland