← Back to Search
Todd Wallack v. Dukes County Sheriff's Office (SPR 20221142)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 05-16-2022
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20221142 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Todd Wallack concerning records held by Dukes County Sheriff's Office, opened 05-16-2022. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20221142
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Todd Wallack
- Custodian
- Dukes County Sheriff's Office
- Date Opened
- 05-16-2022
- Date Closed
- 05-26-2022
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records May 26, 2022 SPR22/1142 James Neville, Sheriff Dukes County Sheriff’s Office 149 Main Street, P.O. Box 252 Edgartown, MA 02539 Dear Sheriff Neville: I have received the petition of Todd Wallack appealing the nonresponse of the Dukes County Sheriff’s Office (Office) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On April 14, 2022, Mr. Wallack requested a copy of all internal affairs investigation records for a specifically identified officer. Claiming to not yet have received responsive records, Mr. Wallack petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR22/1142, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us James Neville, Sheriff SPR22/1142 Page 2 May 26, 2022 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Office is ordered to provide Mr. Wallack with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Todd Wallack