MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Rita Gill-McCarthy v. Boston, City of - Public Records (SPR 20221260)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 05-31-2022

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20221260 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Rita Gill-McCarthy concerning records held by Boston, City of - Public Records, opened 05-31-2022. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20221260
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Rita Gill-McCarthy
Custodian
Boston, City of - Public Records
Date Opened
05-31-2022
Date Closed
06-13-2022

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records June 13, 2022 SPR22/1260 Shawn A. Williams, Esq. Director of Public Records Records Access Officer City of Boston One City Hall Square Boston, MA 02201 Dear Attorney Williams: I have received the petition of Rita Gill-McCarthy appealing the response of the City of Boston (City) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On May 13, 2022, Ms. Gill-McCarthy requested “copies of all invoices submitted to the Boston Police Department from July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021, from [a named company].” On May 27, 2022, the City responded. Unsatisfied with the City’s response, Ms. Gill- McCarthy petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR22/1260, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Att’y for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Shawn Williams, Esq. SPR22/1260 Page 2 June 13, 2022 provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. The City’s May 27th Response In its May 27, 2022 response, the City stated that: a response to this request is due today. I have alerted a representative from the Boston Police Department in an effort to obtain an update on the status of your May 13, 2022 public records request. I will provide an update to you once additional information is provided to me by the department. Based on the City’s response, in conjunction with Ms. Gill-McCarthy’s appeal, it is unclear if the City possesses records responsive to the original request. The duty to comply with requests for records extends to those records that exist and are in the possession, custody, or control of the custodian of records at the time of the request. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a)(ii). To the extent that the requested records exist, I find the City must provide them in a manner consistent with the Public Records Law or identify an exemption that applies to withhold the records from disclosure. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b). Conclusion Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide Ms. Gill-McCarty with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Ms. Gill-McCarthy may appeal the substantive nature of the City’s response within ninety (90) days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Rita Gill-McCarthy