← Back to Search
Walter Wuthmann v. Worcester, City of - Police Department (SPR 20221267)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 06-01-2022
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20221267 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Walter Wuthmann concerning records held by Worcester, City of - Police Department, opened 06-01-2022. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20221267
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Walter Wuthmann
- Date Opened
- 06-01-2022
- Date Closed
- 06-14-2022
- Date Request Submitted
- 05-13-2022
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records June 14, 2022 SPR22/1267 Michael Vigneux Worcester Police Department 911 Lincoln Square Worcester, MA 01608 Dear Mr. Vigneux: I have received the petition of Walter Wuthmann appealing the nonresponse of the Worcester Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On May 13, 2022, Mr. Wuthmann requested all internal affair investigative records for a specifically identified officer. Claiming to not yet have received responsive records, Mr. Wuthmann petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR22/1267, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Michael Vigneux SPR22/1267 Page 2 January 14, 2022 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Mr. Wuthmann with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Walter Wuthmann