MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Paula Sterite v. Everett Community Health and Wellness Center (SPR 20221644)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 07-18-2022

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20221644 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Paula Sterite concerning records held by Everett Community Health and Wellness Center, opened 07-18-2022. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20221644
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Paula Sterite
Custodian
Everett Community Health and Wellness Center
Date Opened
07-18-2022
Date Closed
07-29-2022

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records July 29, 2022 SPR22/1644 Colleen M. Mejia, Esq. City Solicitor City of Everett 484 Broadway, Room 21 Everett, MA 02149 Dear Attorney Mejia: I have received the petition of Paula Sterite appealing the response of the City of Everett (City) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On July 4, 2022, Ms. Sterite requested “an updated total of the paying members at the Wellness Center for 2022.” On July 5, 2022, the City responded. Unsatisfied with the response, Ms. Sterite petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR22/1644, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Att’y for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Colleen M. Mejia, Esq. SPR22/1644 Page 2 July 29, 2022 The City’s July 5th Response In its July 5, 2022 response, the City stated: Total: 2,836 Active Membership-Everett Community Health & Wellness Center[.] This active members does not reflect children under the age of 14 as it has in the past. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this request please feel free to contact [a named individual] at [a specified email address.] Current Appeal In her current appeal, Ms. Sterite asserts that “they provided me with total active members when I asked for paying members which is much less.” Based on the City’s response, in conjunction with Ms. Sterite’s appeal, it is unclear if the City possesses records that may be responsive to her request. The duty to comply with requests for records extends to those records that exist and are in the possession, custody, or control of the custodian of records at the time of the request. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a)(ii). To the extent that the records exist, I find the City must provide them in a manner consistent with the Public Records Law or identify an exemption that applies to withhold the records from disclosure. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b). Conclusion Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide Ms. Sterite with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Paula Sterite