MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Chris Peak v. Boston, City of - Public Records (SPR 20222245)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 10-04-2022

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20222245 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Chris Peak concerning records held by Boston, City of - Public Records, opened 10-04-2022. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20222245
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Chris Peak
Custodian
Boston, City of - Public Records
Date Opened
10-04-2022
Date Closed
10-19-2022
Date Request Submitted
06-29-2022
Response Provided Date
07-11-2022
Processing Fees Charged
0.00
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Time to Comply
10 Days

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records October 19, 2022 SPR22/2245 Shawn A. Williams, Esq. Director of Public Records Record Access Officer City of Boston 1 City Hall Plaza Boston, MA 02201 Dear Attorney Williams: I have received the petition of Chris Peak appealing the response of the City of Boston (City) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On June 29, 2022, Mr. Peak requested the following records: [1] “any financial records, such as an income-and-expense statement, that detail every transaction” over the past decade to seven vendors and [2] “any district evaluations,” such as “employee or parent surveys, test-score or other data analysis, or academic literature reviews” of school’s use over the past decade of eight curricular products, all published by the same company. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Shawn A. Williams, Esq. SPR222/2245 Page 2 October 19, 2022 The City’s August 30th Response In its August 30, 2022 response, the City advised Mr. Peak that, “I will look into this and circle back before the end of the week.” G. L. c. 66, § 10(b) provides, in pertinent part, that if the magnitude or difficulty of the request unduly burdens the other responsibilities of the agency or municipality such that the agency or municipality cannot provide records within 10 business days, the agency or municipality must inform the requestor in writing within 10 business days. With respect to the timeframe to produce responsive records, the written response shall: [I]dentify a reasonable timeframe in which the agency or municipality shall produce the public records sought; provided, that for an agency, the timeframe shall not exceed 15 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records and for a municipality the timeframe shall not exceed 25 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records; and provided further, that the requestor may voluntarily agree to a response date beyond the timeframes set forth herein. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vi). Where Mr. Peak’s request was originally submitted on June 29, 2022, and the City has not provided responsive records, I find the City has not met its burden in responding to the request in accordance with G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vi). Accordingly, I find the City must provide an estimated date as to when it expects to complete its review and provide the requested records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a) (records must be provided without unreasonable delay). Conclusion Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide Mr. Peak with a response to his request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Chris Peak