Daniel L. Holland v. Department of Correction (SPR 20222295)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records October 26, 2022 SPR22/2295 Kate M. Silvia Director of Communications Department of Correction 50 Maple Street, Suite 3 Milford, MA 01757 Dear Ms. Silvia: I have received the petition of Daniel Holland appealing the response of the Department of Correction (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On June 21, 2022, Mr. Holland requested various records regarding Department menus. Prior Appeal The requested records were the subject of a prior appeal. See SPR22/1773 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (August 15, 2022). In my August 15th determination, I found it unclear if the Department had provided all responsive records and ordered the Department to provide a further response. On September 23, 2022, the Department responded. Unsatisfied with the Department’s response, Mr. Holland petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR22/2294, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Kate M. Silvia SPR22/2295 Page 2 October 26, 2022 establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. Current Appeal In his current appeal, Mr. Holland claimed that the Department did not provide all responsive records. Mr. Holland indicated that the Department failed to provide dietician certificate results. The Department’s September 23rd response In its September 23, 2022 response, the Department provided responsive records. Based on the Department’s response, in conjunction with Mr. Holland’s claim, it is unclear if the Department possesses additional records responsive to the above request, specifically, the dietician certificate results. The duty to comply with requests for records extends to those records that exist and are in the possession, custody, or control of the custodian of records at the time of the request. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a)(ii). The Department must clarify this matter. Conclusion Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Mr. Holland with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Daniel Holland