MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Evan Soltas v. Boston, City of - Public Records (SPR 20230821)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 04-27-2023

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20230821 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Evan Soltas concerning records held by Boston, City of - Public Records, opened 04-27-2023. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20230821
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Evan Soltas
Custodian
Boston, City of - Public Records
Date Opened
04-27-2023
Date Closed
05-08-2023

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records May 8, 2023 SPR23/0821 Shawn A. Williams, Esq. Director of Public Records Records Access Officer City of Boston One City Hall Square Boston, MA 02201 Dear Attorney Williams: I have received the petition of Evan Soltas appealing the response of the City of Boston (City) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66 § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On March 28, 2023, Mr. Soltas requested the “[m]ost recent Annual Resident List. Please include all data fields on the form. Ideal data format is a CSV or spreadsheet file.” The City provided a response on April 12, 2023. Unsatisfied with the City’s response, Mr. Soltas petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR23/0821, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Shawn A. Williams, Esq. SPR23/0821 Page 2 May 8, 2023 The City’s April 12th response On April 12, 2023, the City stated the following: I have checked on the status of your March 28, 2023 public records request and it appears that it is still being worked on. I will be in contact with someone in the Elections department to see if we can give a response as soon as possible. I will provide an update to you once additional information is provided to me by this department. Provide timeframe G. L. c. 66, § 10(b) provides, in pertinent part, that if the magnitude or difficulty of the request unduly burdens the other responsibilities of the agency or municipality such that the agency or municipality cannot provide records within 10 business days, the agency or municipality must inform the requestor in writing within 10 business days. With respect to the timeframe to produce responsive records, the written response shall: identify a reasonable timeframe in which the agency or municipality shall produce the public records sought; provided, that for an agency, the timeframe shall not exceed 15 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records and for a municipality the timeframe shall not exceed 25 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records; and provided further, that the requestor may voluntarily agree to a response date beyond the timeframes set forth herein. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vi). Whereas Mr. Soltas’ request was submitted on March 28, 2023, the City has not met its burden in responding to the request in accordance with G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vi). Consequently, I find the City must provide an estimated date as to when it intends to complete the search and provide the responsive records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a) (records must be provided without unreasonable delay). To the extent possible, the City must provide responsive records on a rolling basis. Conclusion Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide Mr. Soltas with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Mr. Soltas may appeal the substantive nature of the City’s response within 90 calendar days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1).

Shawn A. Williams, Esq. SPR23/0821 Page 3 May 8, 2023 Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Evan Soltas