← Back to Search
Jeff Raymond v. Bridgewater, Town of (SPR 20231066)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 05-22-2023
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20231066 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Jeff Raymond concerning records held by Bridgewater, Town of, opened 05-22-2023. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20231066
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Jeff Raymond
- Custodian
- Bridgewater, Town of
- Date Opened
- 05-22-2023
- Date Closed
- 06-02-2023
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records June 2, 2023 SPR23/1066 Kimberly Williams Records Access Officer Town of Bridgewater Municipal Office Building 66 Central Square Bridgewater, MA 02324 Dear Ms. Williams: I have received the petition of Jeff Raymond, of the Bramanville Tribune, appealing the response of the Town of Bridgewater (Town) to his request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, §10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On April 9, 2023, Mr. Raymond requested “any responsive documents and/or communications concerning your municipality’s police department and its compliance with the Massachusetts Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) Commission’s duties under Chapter 253 of the Acts of 2020 to create a ‘database listing complaints against police officers,’ as detailed below.” Specifically, Mr. Raymond requested: [1.] A copy of the document your police department sent to the POST Commission, likely sent between November 2021 and June of 2022, providing the information requested by the POST Commission for its “database listing complaints against police officers” planned for May of 2022…. [2.] Copies of any relevant responsive communications between a) your police department and/or your town officials and b) the POST Commission in regard to the database planned for May of 2022 as detailed above and/or compliance with the reporting for said database between the dates of July 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022, broadly construed…. [3.] Copies of any relevant responsive communications within or between a) your police department and b) your municipal administration in regard to this database and/or compliance with this mandate between the dates of July 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022, broadly construed…. [4.] Information concerning “complaints against police officers” issued in the One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Kimberly Williams SPR23/1066 Page 2 June 2, 2023 calendar year 2022 and through March 31, 2023, preferably in the same format used for the information sent to POST between November 2021 and June of 2022 for the earlier-mentioned database…. [5.] A copy of the document your police department sent to the POST Commission as sent to the POST Commission, likely sent between December 1, 2022 and April 9, 2023, to comply with the “2023 POST Commission Disciplinary Records Resubmission”…. [6.] Copies of any relevant responsive communications within or between a) your police department and b) your municipal administration in regard to this database and/or compliance with the “2023 POST Commission Disciplinary Records Resubmission” described above. The Town responded on April 10, 2023. Unsatisfied with the response, Mr. Raymond petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR23/1066, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Att’y for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. The Town’s April 10th Response In its April 10, 2023 response, the Town states, “[s]ince this request is not within my purview, I am forwarding it to you [an identified individual] for a response.” In a supplemental response to Mr. Raymond dated May 22, 2023, the Town states, “I acknowledge receipt of this appeal. Normally, I would forward it to [an identified individual] but since she is also a recipient, I simple acknowledge that both she and I have received the appeal.” Kimberly Williams SPR23/1066 Page 3 June 2, 2023 On May 25, 2023, the Town forwarded the appeal to the Bridgewater Police Department. The May 25th email states, “I forward the attached information to you [the Bridgewater Police Department] for review and response.” Based on the Town’s responses, in conjunction with Mr. Raymond’s appeal, it is unclear if the Town possesses records responsive to the request. The duty to comply with requests for records extends to those records that exist and are in the possession, custody, or control of the custodian of records at the time of the request. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a)(ii). To the extent that records exist, I find the Town must provide them in a manner consistent with the Public Records Law or identify an exemption that applies to withhold the records from disclosure. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b). See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a) (records must be provided without unreasonable delay). Conclusion Accordingly, the Town is ordered to provide Mr. Raymond with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Jeff Raymond Marilee Hunt Meredith Roselli Chief Christopher D. Delmonte