MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Jeff Raymond v. Groveland, Town of - Police Department (SPR 20231164)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 06-02-2023

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20231164 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Jeff Raymond concerning records held by Groveland, Town of - Police Department, opened 06-02-2023. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20231164
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Jeff Raymond
Custodian
Groveland, Town of - Police Department
Date Opened
06-02-2023
Date Closed
06-13-2023

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records June 13, 2023 SPR23/1164 Jeffrey J. Gillen Chief of Police Groveland Police Department 181 Main Street Groveland, MA 01834 Dear Chief Gillen: I have received the petition of Jeff Raymond, of the Bramanville Tribune, appealing the response of the Groveland Police Department (Department) to his request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On April 10, 2023, Mr. Raymond requested “any responsive documents and/or communications concerning your municipality’s police department and its compliance with the Massachusetts Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) Commission’s duties under Chapter 253 of the Acts of 2020 to create a ‘database listing complaints against police officers,’ as detailed below.” Specifically, Mr. Raymond requested: [1.] A copy of the document your police department sent to the POST Commission, likely sent between November 2021 and June of 2022, providing the information requested by the POST Commission for its “database listing complaints against police officers” planned for May of 2022…. [2.] Copies of any relevant responsive communications between a) your police department and/or your town officials and b) the POST Commission in regard to the database planned for May of 2022 as detailed above and/or compliance with the reporting for said database between the dates of July 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022, broadly construed…. [3.] Copies of any relevant responsive communications within or between a) your police department and b) your municipal administration in regard to this database and/or compliance with this mandate between the dates of July 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022, broadly construed…. [4.] Information concerning “complaints against police officers” issued in the calendar year 2022 and through March 31, 2023, preferably in the same format One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Chief Jeffrey J. Gillen SPR23/1164 Page 2 June 13, 2023 used for the information sent to POST between November 2021 and June of 2022 for the earlier-mentioned database…. [5.] A copy of the document your police department sent to the POST Commission as sent to the POST Commission, likely sent between December 1, 2022 and April 9, 2023, to comply with the “2023 POST Commission Disciplinary Records Resubmission” …. [6.] Copies of any relevant responsive communications within or between a) your police department and b) your municipal administration in regard to this database and/or compliance with the “2023 POST Commission Disciplinary Records Resubmission” described above. On April 13, 2023, Mr. Raymond submitted a second request for the following: [1.] Copies of any responsive communications sent or received by municipal employees and/or officers and/or employees of the police department between the dates of May 1, 2022 and April 14, 2023 that make reference to and/or cite, in whole or in part, the following sentences (as they appear in said records, designated with quotation marks (example: “Public Records”), broadly construed. “the Department intends to withhold the records in their entirety pursuant to 950 CMR 32.08(2)”; “the responsive records in question are the subjects of dispute in active litigation”; “I support thereof, it is the opinion of the Department” [2.] Copies of any responsive communications sent or received by municipal employees and/or officers and/or employees of the police department between the dates of May 1, 2022 and April 14, 2023 that make reference to and/or cite, in whole or in part, the following Massachusetts court cases, broadly construed. Hovsepian, Scott et al. v. Massachusetts Peace Officer Standards and Training Commission, (also known as Hovsepian, or Hovsepian v. Massachusetts Peace Officer Standards and Training Commission, or Hovsepian v. POST, or similar constructions) Suffolk Superior Court Docket no.2284 CV 00906 New England Police Benevolent Association, Inc., and Daniel Gilbert v. Massachusetts Peace Officers Standards and Training Commission (also known as MEBPA v. POST or similar constructions), Suffolk Superior Court Docket no. 2384 CV 00500 [3.] Copies of any responsive communications sent or received by municipal employees and/or officers and/or employees of the police department between the dates of May 1, 2022 and April 14, 2023 that make reference to and/or cite, in whole or in part, the following appeal determinations published by the office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Public Records Office

Chief Jeffrey J. Gillen SPR23/1164 Page 3 June 13, 2023 (“Appeal Determinations”), broadly construed. SPR20221301 (also known as SPR22/1301) (reconsideration; Lynn, City of - Police Department, Custodian) SPR20221373 (also known as SPR22/1373) (reconsideration; Massachusetts Peace Officer Standards and Training Commission, Custodian) The Department responded on April 13, 2023, to the first request. Unsatisfied with the Department’s response to the first request, and lack of response to the second request, Mr. Raymond petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR23/1164, was opened as a result. Based upon a conversation between a Public Records Division staff attorney and a Department representative, it is my understanding that the Department intends on providing a further response to Mr. Raymond. Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Mr. Raymond with said response in a manner consistent with the Public Records Law and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Mr. Raymond may appeal the substantive nature of the Department’s response within ninety days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Jeff Raymond