← Back to Search
Jason Sefton v. Pittsfield, City of - Police Department (SPR 20231589)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 07-11-2023
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20231589 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Jason Sefton concerning records held by Pittsfield, City of - Police Department, opened 07-11-2023. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20231589
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Jason Sefton
- Date Opened
- 07-11-2023
- Date Closed
- 07-24-2023
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records July 24, 2023 SPR23/1589 Abigail Hunt Records Access Officer Pittsfield Police Department 39 Allen Street Pittsfield, MA 01201 Dear Ms. Hunt: I have received the petition of Jason Sefton appealing the response of the Pittsfield Police Department (Department) to his request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On May 31, 2023, Mr. Sefton requested records regarding “an incident that happened in the city of Pittsfield, dated October 15, 2018 resulting in the death of [a named individual].” The Department responded on June 27, 2023. Unsatisfied with the response, Mr. Sefton petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR23/1589, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Abigail Hunt SPR23/1589 Page 2 July 24, 2023 The Department’s June 27th response In its June 27, 2023 response, the Department stated, “there is court case information related to [the] request and the material may be available as part of the discovery process through the District Attorney’s Office handling the case.” In an email sent to this office on July 21, 2023, the Department further stated, “[t]he incident was an arrest and there were charges, therefore it is discovery materials.” Active Litigation 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2)(b) provides in pertinent part: the Supervisor may deny an appeal for, among other reasons if, in the opinion of the Supervisor: 1. the public records in question are the subjects of disputes in active litigation, administrative hearings or mediation. Burden of specificity The Department’s response did not contain the specificity required in a denial of access to public records. The Department did not specify under what exemption of the Public Records Law it intends to withhold the requested record. As a result, I find that the Department did not satisfy its burden in responding to this records request. Any non-exempt, segregable portion of a public record is subject to mandatory disclosure. G. L. c. 66, § 10(a). To the extent that the requested records exist, I find the Department must provide them in a manner consistent with the Public Records Law or identify an exemption that applies to withhold the records from disclosure. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b). Conclusion Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Mr. Sefton with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Mr. Sefton may appeal the substantive nature of the Department’s response within ninety (90) days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Abigail Hunt SPR23/1589 Page 3 July 24, 2023 Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Jason Sefton