MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Hector Montalvo v. Lowell, City of - Police Department (SPR 20232054)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 08-29-2023

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20232054 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Hector Montalvo concerning records held by Lowell, City of - Police Department, opened 08-29-2023. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20232054
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Hector Montalvo
Custodian
Lowell, City of - Police Department
Date Opened
08-29-2023
Date Closed
09-12-2023

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records September 12, 2023 SPR23/2054 Jacqueline Cook Keeper of Records Lowell Police Department 50 Arcand Drive Lowell, MA 01852 Dear Ms. Cook: I have received the petition of Hector Montalvo appealing the response of the Lowell Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On June 15, 2023, Mr. Montalvo requested, “[the] name and badge number of officer in charge for Wednesday morning shift 6/13/2023… [and] name and badge number of officer in charge for Thursday 6/15/2023 morning shift.” The Department provided a response on June 15, 2023. Unsatisfied with the response, Mr. Montalvo petitioned this office, and this appeal, SPR23/2054, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § l0A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Jacqueline Cook SPR23/2054 Page 2 September 12, 2023 custodian must provide the responsive records. The Department’s June 15th Response In its June 15, 2023 response, the Department stated, “[p]lease be advised that most City of Lowell information technologies are currently unavailable due to matters beyond our control. Most information storage (therefore most records) are unavailable at this time, and we are anticipating that records may not be available for another few weeks.” Current appeal In his appeal, Mr. Montalvo states, “[the Department has] refused to send any type of response.” Based on the Department’s response and Mr. Montalvo’s appeal, it is unclear if the Department possesses any records responsive to the request. The duty to comply with requests for records extends to those records that exist and are in the possession, custody, or control of the custodian of records at the time of the request. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a)(ii). Custodians are expected to use their superior knowledge of the records in their custody to assist requestors in obtaining the desired information. See 950 C.M.R. 32.04(5). The Department must clarify this matter. G. L. c. 66, § 10(a) (records must be provided without unreasonable delay). Conclusion Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Mr. Montalvo with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of the response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of the response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Mr. Montalvo may appeal the substantive nature of the Department’s response within ninety (90) days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Hector Montalvo