← Back to Search
Jed Mahoney, Esq. v. Holyoke, City of - Police Department (SPR 20232350)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 10-03-2023
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20232350 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Jed Mahoney, Esq. concerning records held by Holyoke, City of - Police Department, opened 10-03-2023. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20232350
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Jed Mahoney, Esq.
- Custodian
- Holyoke, City of - Police Department
- Date Opened
- 10-03-2023
- Date Closed
- 10-17-2023
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records October 17, 2023 SPR23/2350 Officer Caron L. Porter Records Access Officer Holyoke Police Department 138 Appleton Street Holyoke, MA 01040-5706 Dear Officer Porter: I have received the petition of Jed Mahoney, Esq., of J. Mahoney & Associates LLC, appealing the response of the Holyoke Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On September 12, 2023, Attorney Mahoney requested “… data regarding people arrested for violation of G.L. c 272 sec. 53A (sexual conduct for a fee) and G.L. c 272 sec 53, (common nightwalker) in the City of Holyoke from the current date, 9/12/23, to 12/31/2018. We are seeking arrest reports and arrest report numbers.” On September 13, 2023, the Department responded and indicated that it was withholding responsive records under the Criminal Offender Record Information Act (CORI), as it operates through Exemption (a) of the Public Records Law. Unsatisfied with the Department’s response, Attorney Mahoney petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR23/2350, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv) (written response must “identify any records, categories of records or portions of records that the agency or municipality intends to withhold, and provide the specific reasons for such withholding, including the specific exemption or exemptions upon which the withholding is based…”); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Officer Caron L. Porter SPR23/2350 Page 2 October 17, 2023 also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). The Department’s September 13th response In the Department’s September 13, 2023 response, it stated the following: With respect to your request, the Department intends to withhold the following requested records: Arrest Reports[.] The Department intends to withhold the above-referenced requested records due to the applicability of the following exemptions and the reasons set forth below: 1. Exemption (a): This exemption applies to records that are “specifically or by necessary implication exempt from disclosure by statute.” [CORI]: In particular, G.L. c. 6, sections 167. Current Appeal In his current appeal, Attorney Mahoney claimed that the Department did not meet its burden to withhold responsive records in their entirety. Exemption (a) Exemption (a), known as the statutory exemption, permits the withholding of records that are: specifically or by necessary implication exempted from disclosure by statute G. L. c. 4, § 7(26)(a). A governmental entity may use the statutory exemption as a basis for withholding requested materials where the language of the exempting statute relied upon expressly or necessarily implies that the public’s right to inspect records under the Public Records Law is restricted. See Att’y Gen. v. Collector of Lynn, 377 Mass. 151, 54 (1979); Ottaway Newspapers, Inc. v. Appeals Court, 372 Mass. 539, 545-46 (1977). This exemption creates two categories of exempt records. The first category includes records that are specifically exempt from disclosure by statute. Such statutes expressly state that such a record either “shall not be a public record,” “shall be kept confidential” or “shall not be subject to the disclosure provision of the Public Records Law.” The second category under the exemption includes records deemed exempt under statute by necessary implication. Such statutes expressly limit the dissemination of particular records to a defined group of individuals or entities. A statute is not a basis for exemption if it merely lists individuals or entities to whom the records are to be provided; the statute must expressly limit access to the listed individuals or entities. Officer Caron L. Porter SPR23/2350 Page 3 October 17, 2023 Criminal Offender Record Information The current definition of CORI is as follows: “Criminal offender record information,” records and data in any communicable form compiled by a Massachusetts criminal justice agency which concern an identifiable individual and relate to the nature or disposition of a criminal charge, an arrest, a pre-trial proceeding, other judicial proceedings, previous hearings conducted pursuant to section 58A of chapter 276 where the defendant was detained prior to trial or released with conditions under subsection (2) of section 58A of chapter 276, sentencing, incarceration, rehabilitation, or release. Such information shall be restricted to information recorded in criminal proceedings that are not dismissed before arraignment. Criminal offender record information shall not include evaluative information, statistical and analytical reports and files in which individuals are not directly or indirectly identifiable, or intelligence information. Criminal offender record information shall be limited to information concerning persons who have attained the age of 18 and shall not include any information concerning criminal offenses or acts of delinquency committed by any person before he attained the age of 18; provided, however, that if a person under the age of 18 was adjudicated as an adult in superior court or adjudicated as an adult after transfer of a case from a juvenile session to another trial court department, information relating to such criminal offense shall be criminal offender record information. Criminal offender record information shall not include information concerning any offenses which are not punishable by incarceration. G. L. c. 6, § 167. Pursuant to the Public Records Law, the burden shall be upon the records custodian to establish the applicability of an exemption. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv) (written response must “identify any records, categories of records or portions of records that the agency or municipality intends to withhold, and provide the specific reasons for such withholding, including the specific exemption or exemptions upon which the withholding is based . . .”); see also Globe Newspaper Co. v. Police Comm’r, 419 Mass. 852, 857 (1995); Flatley, 419 Mass. at 511. Based on the Department’s response, I find it has not met its burden of specificity in claiming the CORI Act, operating through Exemption (a), to withhold the arrest reports in their entirety. The Department merely cites the CORI Act without any further explanation as to its applicability to the responsive records. The Department is advised that a records custodian is required to not only cite an exemption, but to specifically explain the applicability of the exemption to the requested records. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv). Any non-exempt, segregable portion of a public record is subject to mandatory disclosure. G. L. c. 66, § 10(a). Officer Caron L. Porter SPR23/2350 Page 4 October 17, 2023 Conclusion Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide a response to Attorney Mahoney in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of the response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Jed Mahoney, Esq.