← Back to Search
Alain Jehlen v. Boston, City of - Public Schools (SPR 20232475)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 10-19-2023
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20232475 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Alain Jehlen concerning records held by Boston, City of - Public Schools, opened 10-19-2023. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20232475
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Alain Jehlen
- Custodian
- Boston, City of - Public Schools
- Date Opened
- 10-19-2023
- Date Closed
- 11-02-2023
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records November 2, 2023 SPR23/2475 Shawn A. Williams, Esq. Director of Public Records Records Access Officer City of Boston One City Hall Square Boston, MA 02201 Dear Attorney Williams: I have received the petition of Alain Jehlen appealing the response of the City of Boston (City) to his request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On August 31, 2023, Mr. Jehlen requested “all written communications that refer to targeting of Black or Latinx educators for harassment or punishment, sent to or from administrators in the Boston Public Schools central office during the month of August, 2022.” The City provided a response on September 15, 2023. Unsatisfied with the City’s response, Mr. Jehlen petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR23/2475, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Shawn A. Williams, Esq. SPR23/2475 Page 2 November 2, 2023 Current appeal In his appeal, Mr. Jehlen states that the City said “it would take them an additional 15 days to comply,” but “[t]hat time has long since expired.” The City’s September 15th response In its September 15, 2023 response, the City states that it “will need up to, but no more than, fifteen (15) additional business days to review and process [the] request.” Timeframe for responding to a request G. L. c. 66, § 10(b) provides, in pertinent part, that if the magnitude or difficulty of the request unduly burdens the other responsibilities of the agency or municipality such that the agency or municipality cannot provide records within 10 business days, the agency or municipality must inform the requestor in writing within 10 business days. With respect to the timeframe to produce responsive records, the written response shall: identify a reasonable timeframe in which the agency or municipality shall produce the public records sought; provided, that ... for a municipality the timeframe shall not exceed 25 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records; and provided further, that the requestor may voluntarily agree to a response date beyond the timeframes set forth herein. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vi). Where Mr. Jehlen’s request was submitted on August 31, 2023, and the City has not provided records nor cited an exemption for withholding records, I find the City has not met its burden in responding to the request in accordance with G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vi). Consequently, I find the City must provide an estimated date as to when it intends to complete the search and provide the responsive records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a) (records must be provided without unreasonable delay). To the extent possible, the City must provide responsive records on a rolling basis. Conclusion Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide Mr. Jehlen with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of the response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Shawn A. Williams, Esq. SPR23/2475 Page 3 November 2, 2023 Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Alain Jehlen