← Back to Search
Steven Minkwitz v. Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth - Administrative Services Division (SPR 20232611)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Administratively closed · Filed 12-19-2023
ClosedAppealResolved
SPR 20232611 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Steven Minkwitz concerning records held by Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth - Administrative Services Division, opened 12-19-2023. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Administratively closed.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20232611
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Recon
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Steven Minkwitz
- Date Opened
- 12-19-2023
- Date Closed
- 01-09-2024
- Date Request Submitted
- 08-21-2023
- Response Provided Date
- 08-23-2023
- Processing Fees Charged
- 0.00
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Went to Court
- No
- Recon Opened
- 12-19-2023
- Recon Closed
- 01-09-2024
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records November 8, 2023 SPR23/2611 Valerie Connolly Records Access Officer Secretary of the Commonwealth Administrative Services Division One Ashburton Place, Room 1710 Boston, MA 02108 Dear Ms. Connolly: I have received the petition of Steven Minkwitz appealing the response of the Administrative Services Division (Division) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On August 21, 2023, Mr. Minkwitz requested a searchable website for police records. The Division provided a response on August 23, 2023. Unsatisfied with the Division’s response, Mr. Minkwitz petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR23/2611, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv) (written response must “identify any records, categories of records or portions of records that the agency or municipality intends to withhold, and provide the specific reasons for such withholding, including the specific exemption or exemptions upon which the withholding is based…”); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Valerie Connolly SPR23/2611 Page 2 November 8, 2023 provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. The Division’s August 23rd response In its August 23, 2023 response, the Division stated, “[t]his office does not have a searchable website that contains police records. This office does not have police records.” The Division further advised, “[e]ach agency is responsible for their own records. In my previous email, I directed you to the state or local police department where the occurrence took place. You note the occurrence happened at your house, you list Ipswich as your address, you may want to contact the Ipswich Police Department, they may be able to assist you or direct you further.” No Duty to Create Records Please be advised, under the Public Records Law the Division is not required to create a record in response to a public records request. See G. L. c. 66, § 6A(d). In addition, a public employee is not required to answer questions, or do research, or create documents in response to questions. See 32 Op. Att’y Gen. 157, 165 (May 18, 1977). The duty to comply with requests for records extends to those records that exist and are in the possession, custody, or control of the custodian of records at the time of the request. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a)(ii). Conclusion Where the Division has confirmed that it does not possess the requested records and has no duty to create records responsive to the request, I will now consider this administrative appeal closed. If Mr. Minkwitz is not satisfied with the resolution of this administrative appeal, he is advised that this office shares jurisdiction with the Superior Court of the Commonwealth. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(A)(c). Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Steven Minkwitz