← Back to Search
Celeste DeMarco v. Wellesley, Town of - Public Schools (SPR 20232621)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Public records appeal decision · Filed 11-14-2023
ClosedFee PetitionDecision
SPR 20232621 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Celeste DeMarco concerning records held by Wellesley, Town of - Public Schools, opened 11-14-2023. Type: Fee Petition. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Public records appeal decision.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20232621
- Case Type
- Fee Petition
- Case Subtype
- Recon
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Celeste DeMarco
- Custodian
- Wellesley, Town of - Public Schools
- Date Opened
- 11-14-2023
- Date Closed
- 12-05-2023
- Recon Opened
- 11-14-2023
- Recon Closed
- 12-05-2023
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records November 7, 2023 SPR23/2621 Cynthia D. Mahr Assistant Superintendent for Finance and Operations Records Access Officer Wellesley Public Schools 40 Kingsbury Street Wellesley, MA 02481 Dear Ms. Mahr: On October 31, 2023, this office received your petition on behalf of the Wellesley Public Schools (School/District) seeking permission to charge for time spent segregating or redacting responsive records. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c); G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). As required by law, it is my understanding that the District furnished a copy of the petition to the requestor, Celeste DeMarco. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c); G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv)(2). On October 15, 2023, Ms. DeMarco requested “…all emails, correspondence, memos, and the like between [named individuals]…between 12/2016 – 12/2018. Please produce emails to which [a named individual] has responded below, and all other emails between these parties.” Petition to assess fees – Municipalities The Supervisor may approve a petition from a municipality to charge for time spent segregating or redacting or to charge in excess of $25 per hour, if the Supervisor determines that 1) the request is for a commercial purpose or 2) the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the municipality to comply with the request. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). In rendering such a decision, the Supervisor is required to consider the following: a) the public interest served by limiting the cost of public access to the records; b) the financial ability of the requestor to pay the additional or increased fees; and c) any other relevant extenuating circumstances. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). The statute sets out a two-prong test for determining whether the Supervisor may approve a municipality’s petition to allow the municipality to charge for time spent segregating or redacting records or to charge in excess of $25 an hour for the provision of public records. The first prong is whether the request for records was made for a commercial purpose. G. L. c. 66, § One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Cynthia D. Mahr SPR23/2621 Page 2 November 7, 2023 10(d)(iv). The second prong of the test is whether the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the municipality to comply with the request. The Supervisor must consider 1) if the fee is necessary such that the request could not have been prudently completed without the redaction or segregation or fee in excess of $25 per hour; 2) the amount of the fee is reasonable; and 3) the fee is not designed to limit, deter or prevent access to requested public records. Id. Petitions seeking a waiver of statutory limits to fees assessed to segregate and/or redact public records must be made within ten business days after receipt of a request for public records. 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4)(g). Fee Estimates – Municipalities A municipality may assess a reasonable fee for the production of a public record except those records that are freely available for public inspection. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d). The fees must reflect the actual cost of complying with a particular request. Id. A maximum fee of five cents ($.05) per page may be assessed for a black and white single or double-sided photocopy of a public record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(i). Municipalities may not assess a fee for the first 2 (two) hours of employee time to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce the record or records requested unless the municipality has 20,000 people or less. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iii). Where appropriate, municipalities may include as part of the fee an hourly rate equal to or less than the hourly rate attributed to the lowest paid employee who has the necessary skill required to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce a record requested, but the fee shall not be more than $25 per hour. Id. However, municipalities may charge more than $25 per hour if such rate is approved by the Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). A fee shall not be assessed for time spent segregating or redacting records unless such segregation or redaction is required by law or approved by the Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). See G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iii); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). Conclusion The District submitted their petition on October 31, 2023, more than ten business days after receipt of the request. In light of the fact the District has not demonstrated it submitted a timely petition, permission to charge for time spent segregating or redacting responsive records cannot be granted. 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4)(g). Cynthia D. Mahr SPR23/2621 Page 3 November 7, 2023 Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Celeste DeMarco