MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Jim Pillsbury v. Framingham, City of - City Clerk (SPR 20240090)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 01-11-2024

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20240090 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Jim Pillsbury concerning records held by Framingham, City of - City Clerk, opened 01-11-2024. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20240090
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Jim Pillsbury
Custodian
Framingham, City of - City Clerk
Date Opened
01-11-2024
Date Closed
01-26-2024

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records January 26, 2024 SPR24/0090 Paul J. Iverson City Clerk/City Records Access Officer City of Framingham 150 Concord Street Framingham, MA 01702 Dear Mr. Iverson: I have received the petition of Jim Pillsbury appealing the response of the City of Framingham (City) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66 § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On December 6, 2023, Mr. Pillsbury requested, “…the current labor contracts the City has with all police unions.” The City provided a response on December 20, 2023. Unsatisfied with the response, Mr. Pillsbury petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR24/0090, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Paul J. Iverson SPR24/0090 Page 2 January 26, 2024 custodian must provide the responsive records. The City’s December 20th response In its December 20, 2023 response, the City stated, “[t]he City intends to provide these records to you, however responding to this request within 10 business days places an undue burden on the responsibilities of the City. As a result, the City is extending the due date for this request by 15 business days.” G. L. c. 66, § 10(b) provides, in pertinent part, that if the magnitude or difficulty of the request unduly burdens the other responsibilities of the agency or municipality such that the agency or municipality cannot provide records within 10 business days, the agency or municipality must inform the requestor in writing within 10 business days. With respect to the timeframe to produce responsive records, the written response shall: identify a reasonable timeframe in which the agency or municipality shall produce the public records sought; provided, that for an agency, the timeframe shall not exceed 15 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records and for a municipality the timeframe shall not exceed 25 business days following the initial receipt of the request for public records; and provided further, that the requestor may voluntarily agree to a response date beyond the timeframes set forth herein. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vi). Whereas Mr. Pillsbury’s request was submitted on December 6, 2023, and the City has not yet provided responsive records, I find the City has not met its burden in responding to the request in accordance with G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vi). Consequently, the City must provide an estimated date as to when it intends to complete the search and provide the requested records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a) (records must be provided without unreasonable delay). To the extent possible, the City must provide responsive records on a rolling basis. Conclusion Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide Mr. Pillsbury with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of the response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us.

Paul J. Iverson SPR24/0090 Page 3 January 26, 2024 Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Jim Pillsbury