MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Ricky Friendly v. Marshfield, Town of - (SPR 20240320)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 02-02-2024

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20240320 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Ricky Friendly concerning records held by Marshfield, Town of -, opened 02-02-2024. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20240320
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Ricky Friendly
Custodian
Marshfield, Town of -
Date Opened
02-02-2024
Date Closed
02-15-2024

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records February 15, 2024 SPR24/0320 Kathleen Maresco Department Records Access Officer Treasurer Collector Department Town of Marshfield 870 Moraine Street Marshfield, MA 02050 Dear Ms. Maresco: I have received the petition of Ricky Friendly appealing the response of the Town of Marshfield (Town) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On January 31, 2024, Mr. Friendly requested, “the current excise tax bill pertaining to 5AMC64.” The Town responded on January 31, 2024. Unsatisfied with the response, Mr. Friendly petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR24/0320, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Kathleen Maresco SPR24/0320 Page 2 February 15, 2024 If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. The Town’s January 31st Response In its January 31, 2024 response, the Town stated, “…[u]nfortunately excise bills are not a public document.” The Town’s January 31st response did not contain the specificity required in a denial of access to public records. As a result, I find that the Town did not satisfy its burden in responding to this records request. Any non-exempt, segregable portion of a public record is subject to mandatory disclosure. G. L. c. 66, § 10(a). To the extent that the requested records exist, I find the Town must provide them in a manner consistent with the Public Records Law or identify an exemption that applies to withhold the records from disclosure. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b). Conclusion Accordingly, the Town is ordered to provide Mr. Friendly with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of the response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Mr. Friendly may appeal the substantive nature of the Town’s response within ninety (90) days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Ricky Friendly