← Back to Search
Kevin Wood v. Georgetown, Town of - Town Clerk (SPR 20240551)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 02-21-2024
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20240551 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Kevin Wood concerning records held by Georgetown, Town of - Town Clerk, opened 02-21-2024. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20240551
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Kevin Wood
- Custodian
- Georgetown, Town of - Town Clerk
- Date Opened
- 02-21-2024
- Date Closed
- 03-06-2024
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records March 6, 2024 SPR24/0551 Kerri Ann McManus Town Clerk Town of Georgetown 1 Library Street Georgetown, MA 01833 Dear Ms. McManus: I have received the petition of Kevin Wood appealing the response of the Town of Georgetown (Town) to a request for public records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). On February 5, 2024, Mr. Wood requested the following: [1.] All performance reviews / evaluations for [a named individual] including transmittal sheets [2.] Any communications related to [the individual’s] performance review / employee evaluation to of from [sic] the Selectmen’s office, individual Selectmen, Conservation Commission members or Agent. The Town responded on February 20, 2024, denying the request. Unsatisfied with the Town’s response, Mr. Wood appealed, and this case was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any agency or municipality of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832 • Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Kerri Ann McManus SPR24/0551 Page 2 March 6, 2024 must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response, a written good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. The Town’s February 20th Response In its February 20, 2024 response, the Towns states that the individual “has had a 45 day evaluation, but it’s a personnel record and is exempt under the public records law.” Burden of Specificity Under the Public Records Law, the burden shall be on the custodian to establish the applicability of an exemption to withhold or redact records. Based on the Town’s response, it is unclear which exemption the Town is citing in order to withhold the requested records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv) (written response must “identify any records, categories of records or portions of records that the agency or municipality intends to withhold, and provide the specific reasons for such withholding, including the specific exemption or exemptions upon which the withholding is based”). See also Globe Newspaper Co. v. Police Comm’r, 419 Mass. 852, 857 (1995); Flatley, 419 Mass. at 511; Reinstein v. Police Comm’r of Boston, 378 Mass. 281, 289-90 (1979) (the statutory exemptions are narrowly construed and are not blanket in nature). Additionally, it is unclear from the Town’s response which specific records the Town intends to withhold. The Town must identify the records, categories of records, or portions of records it intends to withhold or redact, and explain with specificity how an exemption of the Public Records Law applies to withhold or redact such records. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv) Conclusion Accordingly, the Town is ordered to provide Mr. Wood with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of the response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Manza Arthur Supervisor of Records cc: Kevin Wood